PAINTING WORDS AND FOOD: FOOD AS CONCEPTUAL ART
A different kind of answer to the question of whether food, in all its complexities and associations, can and should be considered art can be found in Tom Wolfe’s 1975 diss book The Painted Word. In the text, Wolfe describes in his usual rather polemic poppy style how visual art in the twentieth century became an increasingly non-visual medium, which asked the public to no longer see what happened on the canvas, but instead to use it as a reminder of whatever ideas art theory had instilled in them. In Wolfe’s view, the art itself became a mere illustration of the beautiful, wordy theories of the art critic, who first did away with realism, then with “representational objects. Then we got rid of the third dimension altogether and got really flat (Abstract Expressionism). Then we got rid of airiness, brushstrokes, most of the paint, and the last viruses of drawing and complicated designs”. This evolution concluded in conceptual art, which — as in the example that is about to follow — could be a written account, a documentation, of what could have been a work of art: now purely literary, Wolfe concludes, the visuals could no longer distract from the purity of the work’s theory.
To bring it back to our own thoughts on food and art, the following account describes — although most likely in more detail — an aspect of food that plays a role in all our lives, which is its power to spark our imagination, even, or especially, in absence of the real deal. Do we all create art just by thinking about food? What about all the associations we have with food: Does art imitate life or the other way around? Are recipe books really just works of conceptual art? Read Wolfe’s snarky description of the — fictional? — artwork Beautiful Toast Dream and come to your own conclusions.
Read more about the question of food and art: DINNER AT THE MUSEUM: CLIMBING THE PYRAMID OF NEEDS
Text: Yannic Moeken
Source:
Tom Wolfe: The Painted Word. London, 1975.